We are talking about the forces particles specifically for now, and all of those have been confirmed besides the graviton.

Quote:

Lowmassed particles would be the particles providing the spin, when the mothers were split apart, the low massed particles also formed one with a mass which is extremly low or non existent. This could lead to the graviton.

So this would also mean that the nuclear forces + electromagnetism account for the spin of a particle. And the forces would be strongest in the mother particle, so, what I am saying is this is what might have led to spin. But that really does not explain how the graviton physically works. Unless the differences in the massed particles, which you mentioned, created a polar region of attraction between the graviton (combined forces + decay of mother particle) and the space-time continuum. Wait, perhaps the gravitons are in the space-time continuum deeper, and so when a mass is placed on it, the greater the mass, the more gravitons are released to pull the space-time continuum, which functions as the gravity we know, onto the large mass warping space. I think we may be on to something here.

_________________
I am sorry to report I have destabilized the relative speed of some photons, which caused an immediate singularity to form. Then, the singularity pulled itself away from the space-time continuum and destroyed a local trailer park. I hope my insurance covers this.

I have done some pondering of this theory and I have come to the conclusion that for this to work, there must be a particle that travels at the speed of light. Or in other words, is unaffected by time. Kind of like the tachyons in Star Trek. Since the big bang is the opposite of the Universe condensing, the particles would be reset to initial status. So perhaps gravity is something far stranger than we once thought. Or this theory is wrong. One or the other.

Tachyon is actually already beyond startrek, scientists have been speculating about the existence of such a particle for some time now. I don't see how you come up with the idea of that particle, what made you think about that.

An another note, the Tachyon is the only hypothesized particle that actually travels FASTER than light.
If you use speed from the fourth dimension to move in the other three, wouldn't that lead to a negative time speed for particles that go FTL? That would lead to particles younger than the universe.

Been giving this theory some thought. What if when the Universe collapses into a singularity, the photons interact with the tachyons. And the current value + value of the tachyons determines the speed of light. And this energy warp (whatever you want to call it) causes energy to break free in infinite volume. It is my theory that this energy has the effects of gravity. So yes, it would be composed of gravitons.

Right now I have a simple theory, but I can't seem to get the units of measurement equal to check it or not.

g = c(2)
------
H

g = gravitional constant

C(2) = the speed of light squared

H = the hubble constant

If I could configure the measurements, and if I received the correct Gravitional constant of the current Universe, then my theory would be somewhat confirmed.

So what is this? g/H = c^2 ??

Cus (g = c^2) divided by H makes no sense at all.

The only problem is, is there's no real way as of yet to prove this.

So theoretically speaking this would mean: g = c^2 * H right? For some reason I can't see the logic in this particular formula.

Well, this is going to be too damn hard to explain without typing up like twenty pages. Reread the post describing the equation and see if it clicks. The weird and undefined is how the energy clumps below the space-time continuum to become gravity. And this could be proven with a particle collider. The speed of light could barely be altered in the region of collision. I know it is a wild and blasphemy filled idea to many.

If it is still not clicking, I'll just have to actually talk to you to get this down. Via Live, Maybe you have free calls to US, something like that. Because I don't feel like typing twenty pages ATM.

Wohooo!

We finished the Time Travel Paper! Finally some relaxing time.
And no, still aint clicking.. You should consider turning this into a paper of your own.

Of my ideas on time travel? That's a good idea. I want to do that for a competition at a nearby college, one in which I am entering the physics essay. I would like to write a paper on my ideas of time travel, but it might be rather theoretical, so I was thinking about just going into an elaborate discussion about the Universe in general. I really don't know at this moment what I should do. The paper needs to be emailed the 16th of this month, so I really need to work on that this weekend.

As for your paper, it would be great if I could get a copy and some feedback about what your peers and teachers thought about it.

Sorry, there was no theorising involved just deductive research using already existent theories, not much new info. But we'll see what kind of mark we'll get for it.

I've decided to USE the concept of time in general for my essay. I will include our reasonings in the body of the essay and mail it in by the 16th. Hopefully I can crack the physics/mathematics essay contest.